e-ISSN: 2319-9849
Nurhayat Özdemir*
部门Chemistry, University of Inonu, Malatya, Turkey
Received Date:04/05/2017Accepted Date:07/08/2017Published Date:18/08/2017
Visit for more related articles atdota2雷竞技
13C/12C and18O/16O isotope ratios of marble samples taken from different region of Turkey such as Afyon (27 samples), Marmara (24 samples) and UÅak (16 samples) have been studied. The marble reserve in the other cities of Turkey is high, so13C/12C and18O/16Oisotoperatios of these samples were determined by mass spectrometer. In order to rationalize the result both marbles were not only compared to themselves but also compared with Afyon, Marmara and UÅak samples to reach the conclusion that marbles of their regions could be classified. Using a vacuum extraction line, carbon dioxide prepared by dissolving the marble samples in 105% orthophosphoric acid was purified and subsequently collected in a glass tube for later isotopic analysis. The relative abundance of the13C and18O isotopes was determined with a high precision mass spectrometer. The13C/12C and18O/16O ratios were measured relative to the ratios in a secondary standard.
Stable isotope, Mass spectrometer, White marble, Turkey, Carbon, Oxygen
The identification of sources of white marble used for the production of ancient artifacts is clearly of value to anyone studying economic and art history. Since often no texts can be found which reveal the provenance of the marble used, the identification based on the characteristics of the material itself is a major source of fundamental information for archaeological research. Generally speaking, the naked eye is rather poor tool for the study of marble especially of white marble, due to the subjectivity inherent in visual inspection, the presence of superficial weathering layers and the fact that the differences between marbles from different regions can be very subtle [1-6].
In order to construct a valuable database for archeologist to identify the white marbles, sampling in different sources such as Italy, Greece and Turkey was carried out. The origin of the ancient artifacts was determined usually by determining the ratio of13C/12C and18O/16O isotope ratio levels. To do this, 5 to 10 mg of samples were found to enough for analyzing the samples to construct of a database. Further, analyzed samples were used to estimate the origin of the samples.
It is the aim of this work to determine the isotope ratios of the white marbles taken from different regions of Turkey and to compare the results with the other works. In this work, preparing the samples for isotopeanalysiswas also discussed.
Instrumentation
MagneticMass Spectroscopy (MAT, Finnigan Delta E). The apparatus used for the production of CO2from marbles.
Methodology
13C/12C and18O/16O isotope ratios are determined relative to the secondary standard. Carrara and Pee Dee Bolemnite PDB marbles are used as standarts for working and for instruments respectively.
Materials
A summary of the procedure for preparing CO2is as follows: Fresh samples were taken and grounded and loaded in white polypropylene bottles. 5 to 10 mg samples were placed in a glass tube and the tube was assembled to the unit. High vacuum line technique was applied to remove all air and the acid (3 ml H3PO4105%). At the same time a reference sample (A standard from Sarcophagus in the British Museum, Coleman and Walker 1979) was subjected to the same methodology. Obtained CO2gas was placed in the MAT instrument and the isotope ratşos were detrmined and the mean wa calculated.
The experimental set up procedure for analyzing the samples. In the initial step,vacuumline technique was used to detrmined the air, since the air is the major problem for determining the isotope ratios. A final step in the analyzing is to remove the samples from the apparatus and to prepare for analysis [7].
According to the results, Malatya Yeşilyurt and Malatya Doganşehir samples lie beyond the optimum. Whereas Kırşehir, Nigde originated from the central part of Anaotolia are alike. Not only Bursa Kemalpaşa, Sümenköy and Örencik, but also Kavaklıdere, Mugla region, Milas pink, Başaran, Milas Kavaklıdere and Biga white marbles are formed a different category among themselves. Others, İda, Bayrami and Kazdagı. Samples resemble to the white marbles of Uşak. Yatagan, Mugla and Manyas are alike with Afyon white marbles. Denizli Kavaklıbeki and Elbistan are much alike with the marbles of Uşak and Denizli (Table 1).
Marble samples | Samples (mg) | Pressure mbar | CaCO3% | δ13C | δ18O |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1) Malatya Yeşilyurt | 9.865 9.38 |
117.4 119.7 |
87.76 94.07 |
+4.801 + 5.124 |
-6.643 -7.216 |
2) Malatya Doganşehir | 9.22 9.13 |
83.2 84.4 |
67.14 68.75 |
+0.742 +0.716 +0.735 |
-3.739 -3.581 -3.267 |
3) Kırşehir | 9.268 9.925 |
120.6 129.7 |
95.91 96.18 |
+3.044 +3.024 |
-2.623 -2.456 |
4) Mugla Yöresi | 9.001 9.415 |
114.2 119.4 |
93.62 93.49 |
+3.665 +3.704 |
-5.134 -4.818 |
5) Mugla Kavaklıdere | 9.415 9.455 |
123.6 126.1 |
96.71 98.21 |
+4.295 +4.298 |
-5.025 -4.843 |
6) Afyon.3. | 9.841 9.205 |
127.4 114.4 |
95.32 91.71 |
+3.780 +3.725 |
-3.333 -3.612 |
7) Marmara.2. | 9.209 9.175 |
121.8 121.1 |
97.47 97.28 |
+3.528 +3.539 |
-1.458 -1.735 |
8) Nigde | 8.876 9.175 |
119.8 122.5 |
99.5 98.38 |
+3.824 +3.866 |
-0.308 -0.539 |
9) Mugla Yatagan | 8.604 9.005 |
117.0 120.2 |
100 98.39 |
+1.350 +1.363 |
-3.885 -4.133 |
10)米拉Sedefi | 9.334 8.76 |
124.1 121.8 |
97.94 102 |
+3.809 +3.825 +3.809 |
-1.358 .2.105 -1.672 |
11) Mucur white | 9.565 9.24 |
129.3 123.1 |
99.50 98.16 |
+2.923 +2.917 +2.899 |
-1.228 -1.695 -1.260 |
12) Maraş Elbistan | 9.249 9.65 |
123.3 126.7 |
98.22 96.68 | +2.337 +2.347 |
-1.525 -1.751 |
14) Mugla Başaran |
9.815 9.5 |
131.8 125.7 |
98.80 97.44 |
+3.868 +3.906 |
-3.025 -2.914 |
16) Uşak Afyon arası |
9.202 9.245 |
123.3 121.3 |
98.72 96.70 |
+2.091 +2.098 |
-4.662 -4.840 |
17) Manyas | 9.527 9.44 |
128.5 124.4 |
99.29 97.07 |
+2.573 +2.592 |
-3.716 -3.697 |
18) Milas pembe | 9.701 9.23 |
131.0 118.6 |
99.37 94.74 |
+3.932 +3.976 |
-3.134 -3.039 |
19) Mugla | 9.81 9.305 |
132.5 122.7 |
99.37 97.16 |
+1.762 +1.759 |
-3.324 -3.494 |
20) Milas Kavaklıdere | 9.193 9.465 |
118.5 121.0 |
95.05 94.22 |
+3.714 +3.762 |
-5.191 -5.161 |
21) Bursa Kemalpaşa | 9.405 9.1 |
126.6 118.2 |
99.12 95.78 |
+4.647 +4.631 +4.639 |
-2.544 -3.085 -2.505 |
22) Bursa Kemalpaşa Sümenköy |
9.805 9.55 |
131.2 126.6 |
98.46 97.61 |
+4.915 +4.920 |
-2.447 -2.363 |
23) İda Kazdagı | 9.525 9.185 |
127.0 120.7 |
98.17 96.86 |
+0.962 +0.968 |
-2.660 -2.730 |
24) Kazdagı Bayramiş |
9.275.9.235 | 122.7 123.4 |
97.47 98.44 |
+1.895 +1.888 |
-1.765 -1.700 |
25) Denizli | 9.6 9.36 |
124.3 123.2 |
95.38 96.97 |
+ 2.769 + 2.766 +2.760 |
-2.857 -2.224 -2.290 |
26) Bursa Örencik | 9.46 9.165 |
124.8 122.4 |
97.17 98.41 |
+5.098 +5.140 |
-1.187 -0.943 |
27) Sivaslı Kavallıbeki köyü |
9.115 9.595 |
120.8 129.1 |
97.68 99.04 |
+2.374 +2.383 |
-2.405 -2.246 |
28) Kazdagı | 9.305 9.54 |
125.1 129.0 |
99.02 99.53 |
+ 2.747 +2.779 |
-3.701 -3.594 |
29) Uşak | 9.645 9.25 |
128.4 123.8 |
98.00 98.60 |
+2.576 +2.620 |
-5.745 -5.476 |
30) Afyon İslihisar | 9.8 9.5 |
130.7 127.2 |
98.14 98.58 |
+1.657 +1.655 |
-8.891 -9.050 |
31) Bursa Karlık | 9.24 9.36 |
121.4 125.5 |
96.82 98.74 |
+0.786 +0.836 |
-3.799 -3.653 |
32) Biga | 9.83 9.39 |
131.2 125.3 |
98.21 98.28 |
+3.695 +3.706 |
-5.514 -5.418 |
Table 1.Sample description and data.
As a result it is found possible to identify and categorize the Bursa, Malatya, Central Anotolia and south Aegan white marbles by means of isope ratio levels [8,9].
13C/12C and18O/16O isotope ratios of marble samples taken from different region of Turkey such as Afyon (27 samples), Marmara (24 samples) and Uşak (16 samples) have been studied. it is found possible to identify and categorize the Bursa, Malatya, Central Anotolia and south Aegan white marbles by means of isope ratio levels.
我们感激地感谢Instituut Voor远离Wetenschappen, Proeftuinstraat 86, B.9000 GENT, Belgium.